Atomic Models Web Quest

Atomic Models Webquest

"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." Neils Bohr

Creating an Atomic Model



Introduction

The discovery of the atom as we know it today was a progression, like the discovery of DNA or any other major scientific discovery. Many scientists contributed to the development of present day atomic theory. Each proposed model of the atom was based on the models developed prior to it. With each new discovery dealing with the nature of the atom, a new atomic model was constructed. The first person to believe in the existence of the atom was Democritus in 400 B.C.

Your Task

Make a model of each progression of the atom listed below.
Write a brief description to go with each model explaining the various components
Present the models to the class for peer review

Be sure to include a list of resources used to complete your project (i.e. web sites, books)



Atomic Models


Solid Sphere Model or
Billiard Ball Model
proposed by John Dalton
Plum Pudding Model or
Raisin Bun Model
proposed by J.J. Thomson
Planetary Model or
Nuclear Model
proposed by Ernest Rutherford
Bohr Model or
Orbit Model
proposed by Neils Bohr
Electron Cloud Model or
Quantum Mechanical Model
proposed by Louis de Broglie
& Erwin Schrodinger

Links to Atomic Models


Background Reading for Atomic Models:

Leucippu: founder of Atomism
A Look Inside the Atom
Atomic Structures
History of the Atomic Model
J.J. Thomson's theory of electrons
Atomic Theory
VisionLearning Atomic Theory

Examples of Atomic Models:

John Dalton's Atomic Model
J. J. Thomson Atomic Model
Schrodinger and Bohr Atomic Models
Description of Each Atomic Model

Your Product

Models for each progression of the atom (5 total)
Brief Description for each model
List of resources (bibliography) - site a minimum of 3 sources


Assessment

This project will count as one test grade (100 pts) for the 2nd quarter.
Grading Considerations (see peer grading sheet)
1. Accuracy of information
2. Appearance of models
3. Creativity
4. Presentation of models to the class

________________________________________________________________________
Peer Grading Sheet
Name:  ________________					      1 - poor        5 - excellent
Appearance:			1	2	3	4	5
Correctness of Information	1	2	3	4	5
Creativity			1	2	3	4	5
Presentation			1	2	3	4	5

Overall Grade:
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
	     very poor                                                               excellent

Comments:

Photo Credits

Solid Sphere Model, Planetary Model: http://www.suhsd.k12.ca.us/moh/science/Murphy/StudentProjects/DaveJohn/ATOM.HTM
Plum Pudding Model: http://www.sci.tamucc.edu/pals/morvant/genchem/atomic/page6.htm
Bohr Model: http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/atom.htm
Electron Cloud Model: www.mtsu.edu/~sschmidt/Cognitive/ intro/intro.html



© 2002
webquest by Langlais and Alicia Cornelio contact us